Case Safford Vs. Redding - 1244 Words

Case: Safford Vs. Redding, (2009). Facts: Safford Unified School District and April Redding, The dispute of this case is when Savannah’s privacy became violated when Safford School District stripped search her and revealed some private areas and her upper chest area. It got to the Supreme Court, when the district court reward a motion, then the Ninth circuit court reversed the ruling on the strip search because it was unconstitutional for them to strip search Savannah the second time.., The Supreme Court used New Jersey VS. T.L.O in the process of helping in the decision because in that case it was school officials searching a girls pursue because they had reasonable doubt that she was carrying cigs and had a list of the people that owed†¦show more content†¦A. Rule: The court case of T.L.O. also establishes a more compassionate standard of what they review as a â€Å"reasonable suspicion†, in what goes on to determine whether or not the lawfulness of the search was in the school policy or follows district policy too. To lead reasonable suspicion can sum up and equalized,when it leans toward a lessen of any chance of finding evidence of wrongful behavior in a student or individual. Of all the information Wilson acquired from the Faculty and other questionable sources from students, Marissa’s statement of the pills came from Savannah that lead was sufficient in justification of a search upon Savannah’s backpack. In addition the Savannah’s outer clothing. Savannah reasoning could be possibly was reckoning of carrying the tylenol. The disgraceful strip search and seizure that ultimately exposed her private areas to some degree.The content of this belief failed to match the degree of intrusiveness she was getting from the school. Nothing was led to suggested the amount and quantity of the drugs, could appeal to pose a real danger to any of the students or to that of Savannah in carrying pills in her underwear or in bra.School officials are allowed and can search any students belongings and lockers. They are entitled to qualified immunity where it clearly states and establishes as qualified immunity and establishedShow MoreRelatedNew Jersey Vs. Tlo1063 Words   |  5 Pagesat least three points that would support the petitioner. (15 Points) The fourth amendment wasn t broken They had evidence to believe it was Redding The school had the right to have suspicion List and explain court precedents, or previous judicial decisions on similar issues, which support the petitioner. (20 Points) New Jersey vs. TLO In this case two students who were female where smoking in the laboratory. When caught one of the students admitted to smoking as for the other she denied whenRead MoreStop Illegal Searches in Schools575 Words   |  2 Pagespossess in the first place would cause the student mental strain and a possible loss of trust in the adult carrying out the search and others in the school that didn’t challenge the validity of the search. In the court case of Safford Unified School District, the administrators of Safford Middle School strip searched a thirteen year old girl. The administrators were informed that she was in the possession of prescription strength ibuprofen and had given some to another student. The school was not providedRead MoreThe Violation Of The Fourth Amendment3158 Words   |  13 Pages(O’Brien, 2014). As this pertains to those citizens who are students, whether it be in the primary, secondary, or post-secondary setting, the question that unveils itself is whether or not students are entitled to their constitutional rights, in this case, the fourth amendment’s rights, while in the school environment. Such actions that may violate a student’s constitutional rights as a citizen would be an administrator or school law enforcement searching a student or their personal belongings forRead MoreAn Examination Of Public School Students Fourth Amendment Rights On Campus2286 Words   |  10 Pages Privacy vs. Safety An Examination of Public School Students’ Fourth Amendment Rights on Campus Kathryn Hesse Communication 385 Fall 2014 The Fourth Amendment was written to protect every American’s personal right to privacy by issuing requirement for searches and seizures of one’s person and property. This amendment protects U.S. citizens from having their privacy violated by the government for no reason. According to the Fourth Amendment, â€Å"The right of the people to be secure